To explain each category, I tried to find examples, or pictures, that would help illustrate my words. It was a lot harder finding an example of each than I thought it would be. Click on the pictures to make them larger.
1. Word specific: pictures illustrate but don’t significantly add to a largely
complete textI chose this comic because if you just looked at the pictures, you could come up with a different meaning than what you get from the text. After you read the text, though, the picture makes more sense.
2. Picture specific: words do little more than add a soundtrack to a visually told sequence
This comic is all about the pictures. The words really are the "soundtrack" to the action taking place.

3. Duo-Specific: both words and pictures send essentially the same message
You could just look at the pictures and grasp the message (and vice versa).

4. Additive: words amplify or elaborate on an image or vice versa
5. Parallel: words and pictures seem to follow very different courses without intersec
ting
This was the hardest example for me to find. It may be a stretch. I chose it because the text and the pictures don't really make sense together. The text and the picture seem to be two different stories.
6. Montage: words are treated as integral parts of the picture
7. Interdependent: words and pictures go hand in hand to convey an idea that ne
ither could convey alone
The text and the pictures work together nicely. In this case, the text says more than the picture, so the picture is allowed to be more free.


Thank you for your examples Rachel--nice work! When you put together your multimedia letter, you could consider which of McCloud's strategies you find yourself using.
ReplyDelete